Experts and Values | Page 2

Invited talk

Usages légitimes des valeurs dans le travail d’experts : où tracer la limite?

This content is not available in the selected language. Résumé La thèse selon laquelle un expert ne doit pas faire de jugement de valeur ne résiste pas longtemps à l’analyse. Une fois que cette thèse est rejetée, le défi est de tracer la limite des usages légitimes des valeurs. Après une recension d’une sélection des […] Read more

Internal seminars of the Chair

Experts et valeurs: un état de la question

Internal seminars of the Chair aim to present in more details the different research projects of the Chair to other team members. These seminars also help to get useful feedback from the team. If you are not a member of the Chair's team and would like to attend, please communicate with Jérémie Dion. This week, Anthony will […] Read more

On the Roles of Values in Expert Reasoning and Testimonies

The value-free ideal is untenable: a series of arguments tend to establish that experts ought to let value judgments affect their actions. But where should we draw the line between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in expert reasoning and testimonies? This question drives this research project. Related pages Read more

Refereed conference

On the Illegitimate Roles of Values in Expert Reasoning and Interventions

The idea that there is no legitimate roles to values in expert reasoning and interventions is widely rejected, and rightly so. There is also a tacit agreement that some roles of values are nevertheless illegitimate. The difficulty lies in characterizing with some precision what these illegitimate roles are. This article starts by arguing that the […] Read more